SiteGround vs. Bluehost: Which Shared Host to Choose in 2019
SiteGround is far better hosting than Bluehost. In fact, while SiteGround might or might not be the correct hosting for you depending on your project, the truth is that there’s never a good reason to buy Bluehost hosting.
Strong claims, right? This isn’t our own personal opinion: it comes from analyzing thousands of honest, unbiased reviews from real SiteGround and Bluehost customers. The trend is very clear: SiteGround’s customers like SiteGround, and Bluehost’s customers don’t like Bluehost.
In other words, taking into account performance, price, customer support, features, and every other variable a hosting customer might have reason to value, the truth is that SiteGround is a good hosting product for most users. Bluehost is simply not.
SiteGround vs. Bluehost: The Data
Below is our summary of customer satisfaction and performance ratings of both Bluehost and SiteGround from multiple trustworthy sources.
Again, these are not our opinions: the customer satisfaction ratings aggregate thousands of real, unbiased users’ experience using Bluehost and SiteGround. The performance ratings are rigorous, consistent, unbiased tests conducted by Review Signal, one of the most trusted voices in hosting.
Bluehost vs. SiteGround: Customer Satisfaction Compared
|2018 CodeInWP survey|
Average user rating out of 5
|2018 Web Hosting Geeks data|
Average user rating out of 5
|2018 Review Signal data|
Percent of mentions that are positive
Bluehost vs. SiteGround: Performance Compared
Review Signal’s 2018 Performance Benchmarks compared SiteGround’s and Bluehost’s shared hosting plans using an extremely detailed, thorough set of performance tests. The results:
- Load testing, simulating up to 1,000 concurrent users. SiteGround “handled this test without issue.” Bluehost “struggled with this test; they showed errors and increased response times.”
- Load testing, simulating up to 2,000 concurrent users. SiteGround “handled this test without issue.” Bluehost “ran into security issues we couldn’t work to bypass. They were perhaps the most bizarre graphs I have seen during all my years of testing.”
- Uptime monitoring. SiteGround 99.99%, Bluehost 99.97%. (But see our thoughts on why uptime monitoring is not always the most useful metric.)
SiteGround? Maybe, Depending on Your Needs. Bluehost? Never.
The best source is thousands of real users, and they couldn’t be more clear: SiteGround is a good host, and Bluehost is a bad one. You should never use Bluehost under any circumstances. So should you go with SiteGround? Maybe, depending on the nature of your project.
To find out which host to choose, and whether SiteGround is the right fit for you, we recommend two further resources. First is our comprehensive guide to the WordPress hosting space, ranking not just SiteGround and Bluehost but all major WordPress hosts, using the same trustworthy, objective processes you’re seeing here:
And the second resource is our guide to understanding WordPress hosting itself: what to think about with respect to topics like hosting type, performance, uptime, and price, and how to find the right hosting for your specific project.
Lastly, if you need thoughts from a trustworthy human being, we’d love to help point you in the right direction for your project. You can contact us directly by email (
contact@ this website dot com), or come say hello in our Facebook group.
Thanks for reading!